Still Not Grateful - More on Foal Registration

Tara Madgwick - Tuesday July 30
One of our readers has sent in a compelling story on her experience with Racing Australia and their foal registration rules, while Mary Bray, who started the ball rolling on this contentious issue explains just where the conflict lies.

Susan - In August 2016, I wrote about why I was not grateful that Racing Australia was proposing a rule change that required foals to be registered under the Rules of Racing for the stated purpose of horse welfare.

The horse transfer form and $55 fee came unannounced from that change.

I sold a colt at the Vobis sale in 2018. That colt was prepared, entered and passed in at a ready to run sale in October 2018. The My Racing Australia horse record showed that until two weeks ago that colt was residing at the place he had been born and had never left.

He turns three on 1 August. Racing Australia says it is up to the purchaser to fill out the transfer form. That doesn't happen until a horse is named which is sometimes never and certainly not straight after sale. Until last week when the colt was named, I was technically on the record as responsible for a horse that had been through public auction twice. If the horse hadn't been named but simply sold on and on…… and or died or being subjected to neglect or cruelty, there was no record at all.

The neat little transfer cost inserted into the process is annoying and has failed to deliver the promised outcome. Today I was asked to sign a transfer on a horse sold in May last year; last month on a horse sold 18 months ago. If they weren't being named there is no trace of their whereabouts or their welfare and the record is no more advanced than it was under the old system.

Racing Australia's latest annual report says that the change was to improve animal welfare through traceability and transparency. So, is the $55 transfer fee being used for that purpose? 35% of Racing Australia's revenue comes from the breeding industry and covers almost half Racing Australia's expenses but the question is how has any of this been applied to improve traceability and transparency on what applied before. What is the measure of this rule's success?

Dear Racing Australia, your rule has failed. It was never going to achieve what you said it would and it hasn't. It is time to revoke the rule and start again if the intended purpose is horse welfare and not revenue raising. The proof of an effective business plan is the measure of its success. Not seeing it and still not grateful.

Mary Bray offers the following - Importantly, the rule seeks to capture all transfers which occur before the horse is first registered/named, regardless of how many transfers take place and when those transfers take place in that period. It is not acceptable for the ownership records to be corrected at the time of registration, which could be a year or more after the transfer occurred.

This is where the conflict lies. Here is the usual sequence of for naming a horse:

1 . Horse is born – ownership record goes in – no fee – happens when you submit your mare return
2 . Foal may be sold/transferred – new ownership record goes in $55 fee
3 . Horse is named $110 fee – now here is the problem. Almost every time this occurs you will have a new set of owners that are going to participate in the racing of the horse – RA is expecting another lodgement of foal ownership change before this goes in - $55 fee, however in my opinion (shared by a an increasing number of trainers, owners, syndicators who have been caught by this)
  • a.The foal ownership is NOT changing per se
  • b.The newly named horse is getting it's racing ownership with all the bank details and percentages etc as has always happened.
  • c.Adding a separate requirement and fee for this is seen as a fee for no service and totally incorrect.
  • d.You have the foal ownership at the time of the change and the new ownership in the named horse. This gives you full accountability of the provenance of the horse from foal to racehorse.

4. I believe this needs an urgent review from Racing Australia as although the underlying policy is a worthy one, the implementation is clearly wrong and the overwhelming response from your affected clients is that they are being charged for nothing.

Also please note that in point 3, this also affects trainers/syndicators who purchase at auction, put in their change of ownership as required within the 4 week period, then have to pay it again when they get together the list of owners and the name for the horse which is rarely within 4 weeks of purchasing a foal or yearling. I believe the only people unaffected would be owners such as Darley who have their foals continue in their name as racehorses.

If your feel you wish to add your comments , email us at media@breednet.com.au 



Advertisment
More Reading...
Stage Set For 2025 NZB Breeze Ups
Breeze Ups for the world’s best sale of two-year-olds are set to take place next week on Monday 20 and Tuesday 21 October at Te Rapa Racecourse.
Autumn Boy Half-Sister for Inglis Digital
A winning half sister to last weekend’s G1 Caulfield Guineas winner Autumn Boy and a host of other interesting racing prospects headline a diverse catalogue for the Inglis Digital October (Late) Online Sale.
State of Excitement for Cambridge Stud
In a week where Cambridge Stud’s focus is largely around Joliestar’s tilt at the A$20 million Gr.1 The Everest (1200m), it was their first-season sire Sword Of State who was making headlines across the Tasman on Wednesday.
Juvenile Trial Watch – Warwick Farm
Two heats for juveniles at Warwick Farm on Friday morning produced a couple of interesting winners with a quinella for a pair of blueblood Wootton Bassett (GB) fillies and a smart win for a good looking colt by Ole Kirk.
Written By Popular at Inglis Ready 2 Race
The Inglis Ready 2 Race Sale on Thursday produced a glowing endorsement for the progeny of Written By through the eyes of Asian buyers with five offered and all of them sold to either Hong Kong or Malaysia at an average $256,000.
Breeding To Win- 2025 G1 Caulfield Cup
While the Everest party for the glam sprinters is going full bore in Sydney, Melbourne will be decked out in full finery to celebrate the first of its two iconic and venerable Cups.
Everest Runners – 5 Generation Pedigrees for All
Are you a pedigree nerd? We’ve got something to make your day with five generation pedigrees for all 12 Everest runners offering a mine of information on the dozen sprinters looking to capture the world’s richest race on turf this Saturday at Randwick.
G1 VRC Derby Ahead For Autumn Mystery
Breaking his maiden last time out when capturing the VRC Derby Preview (1800m) at Flemington, the Rory Hunter trained Autumn Mystery put himself into the $2m Group 1 VRC Derby (2500m) picture with a strong win in the Group 2 MRC Sportsbet Classic (2000m) on Caulfield Cup day.
Can McDonald Take Down Ka Ying Rising?
Having ridden in six previous editions of The Everest (1200m) as well as multiple clashes with Ka Ying Rising in Hong Kong, jockey James McDonald has a good idea of what to expect when the world’s highest-rated sprinter makes his Australian debut in the A$20 million feature at Randwick on Saturday.
Agera Wins Listed Matamata Cup
Agera’s coming-of-age campaign has carried him all the way up to black-type level, flying home to score a last-gasp victory in Friday’s Listed Team Wealleans Matamata Cup (1600m).