Still Not Grateful - More on Foal Registration

Tara Madgwick - Tuesday July 30
One of our readers has sent in a compelling story on her experience with Racing Australia and their foal registration rules, while Mary Bray, who started the ball rolling on this contentious issue explains just where the conflict lies.

Susan - In August 2016, I wrote about why I was not grateful that Racing Australia was proposing a rule change that required foals to be registered under the Rules of Racing for the stated purpose of horse welfare.

The horse transfer form and $55 fee came unannounced from that change.

I sold a colt at the Vobis sale in 2018. That colt was prepared, entered and passed in at a ready to run sale in October 2018. The My Racing Australia horse record showed that until two weeks ago that colt was residing at the place he had been born and had never left.

He turns three on 1 August. Racing Australia says it is up to the purchaser to fill out the transfer form. That doesn't happen until a horse is named which is sometimes never and certainly not straight after sale. Until last week when the colt was named, I was technically on the record as responsible for a horse that had been through public auction twice. If the horse hadn't been named but simply sold on and on…… and or died or being subjected to neglect or cruelty, there was no record at all.

The neat little transfer cost inserted into the process is annoying and has failed to deliver the promised outcome. Today I was asked to sign a transfer on a horse sold in May last year; last month on a horse sold 18 months ago. If they weren't being named there is no trace of their whereabouts or their welfare and the record is no more advanced than it was under the old system.

Racing Australia's latest annual report says that the change was to improve animal welfare through traceability and transparency. So, is the $55 transfer fee being used for that purpose? 35% of Racing Australia's revenue comes from the breeding industry and covers almost half Racing Australia's expenses but the question is how has any of this been applied to improve traceability and transparency on what applied before. What is the measure of this rule's success?

Dear Racing Australia, your rule has failed. It was never going to achieve what you said it would and it hasn't. It is time to revoke the rule and start again if the intended purpose is horse welfare and not revenue raising. The proof of an effective business plan is the measure of its success. Not seeing it and still not grateful.

Mary Bray offers the following - Importantly, the rule seeks to capture all transfers which occur before the horse is first registered/named, regardless of how many transfers take place and when those transfers take place in that period. It is not acceptable for the ownership records to be corrected at the time of registration, which could be a year or more after the transfer occurred.

This is where the conflict lies. Here is the usual sequence of for naming a horse:

1 . Horse is born – ownership record goes in – no fee – happens when you submit your mare return
2 . Foal may be sold/transferred – new ownership record goes in $55 fee
3 . Horse is named $110 fee – now here is the problem. Almost every time this occurs you will have a new set of owners that are going to participate in the racing of the horse – RA is expecting another lodgement of foal ownership change before this goes in - $55 fee, however in my opinion (shared by a an increasing number of trainers, owners, syndicators who have been caught by this)
  • a.The foal ownership is NOT changing per se
  • b.The newly named horse is getting it's racing ownership with all the bank details and percentages etc as has always happened.
  • c.Adding a separate requirement and fee for this is seen as a fee for no service and totally incorrect.
  • d.You have the foal ownership at the time of the change and the new ownership in the named horse. This gives you full accountability of the provenance of the horse from foal to racehorse.

4. I believe this needs an urgent review from Racing Australia as although the underlying policy is a worthy one, the implementation is clearly wrong and the overwhelming response from your affected clients is that they are being charged for nothing.

Also please note that in point 3, this also affects trainers/syndicators who purchase at auction, put in their change of ownership as required within the 4 week period, then have to pay it again when they get together the list of owners and the name for the horse which is rarely within 4 weeks of purchasing a foal or yearling. I believe the only people unaffected would be owners such as Darley who have their foals continue in their name as racehorses.

If your feel you wish to add your comments , email us at media@breednet.com.au 



Advertisment
More Reading...
Well Bred Wootton Bassett Ready to Win
Regally bred colt Lydiard Park will have conditions more in his favour on Wednesday to add performance to his pedigree.
Obucci Breaks Through For Hanseatic At Sandown
With a last start second behind Frankel filly Chateau Eze who went on to record a Listed second at her next start in the Jim Maloney Stakes, the Phillip Stokes trained Hanseatic filly Obucci was sent out at double figure odds at Sandown on Wednesday, breaking her maiden by three parts of a length.
Sires With Winners - Tuesday September 23
Here is the full list of 28 stallions which had winners throughout Australasia today with winners and result details.
Change of Barrier Luck for Written By's Tale of the Gypsy
Lady Luck has finally smiled on talented filly Tale Of The Gypsy, who has been plagued by wide barriers throughout her short career to date.
Angel Capital to Run for James Harron in Everest
James Harron Bloodstock is excited to announce a partnership with global thoroughbred powerhouse Yulong for The Everest 2025, with rising star Angel Capital today confirmed as the runner in the James Harron Bloodstock slot.
Flying Artie Filly Wins $100,000 Super Maiden for Ingham Family
Blue Gum Farm’s Flying Artie has a very strong crop of three year-olds running for him this season and a promising filly that can call $10million earner Fangirl ‘Aunt FannyG’ was his latest winner when scoring at Warwick Farm on Wednesday.
Charm Stone share sells for $310,000 ahead of G1 Manikato
A 10% share in G1-winning mare Charm Stone has topped the September (Late) Online Sale selling for $310,000, the second highest price for a racehorse share on the platform this year.
Seeking Slipper Success? Seek Sejardan
The Gr.1 Golden Slipper Stakes - the world's richest juvenile event and Australia's premier test of juvenile speed.
Wootton Bassett Sad Passing
Wootton Bassett, one of the world’s great sires, has sadly passed away today at Coolmore Australia.
Golden Rose Sires Where Are They Now?
Since the $1million Golden Rose was elevated to Group I status in 2009 it has been won in every single year bar one by a colt with the lone gelding to succeed being Manawanui in 2011 and winning this race is a passport to a commercial stud career, so we thought we’d take a look at the fortunes of the past winners who have gone to stud in Australia.